Double NoScript

NoScript Work
Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first “pure” WebExtension NoScript version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months NoScript 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for WebExtensions APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of “NoScript Security Suite” most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and XSS protection (now with a huge performance boost) are already there. And yes, Firefox 57 is truly the most awesome browser around.

If, otherwise, you really need the full-rounded, solid, old NoScript experience you’re used to, and you can’t bear anything different, even if just for a few weeks, dont’ worry: NoScript 5.x is going to be maintained and to receive security updates until June 2018 at least, when the Tor Browser will switch to be based on Firefox 59 ESR and the “new” NoScript will be as powerful as the old one. Of course, in order to keep using NoScript 5.x outside the Tor Browser (which has it built-in), you have to stay on Firefox 52 ESR, Seamonkey, Palemoon or another pre-Quantum browser.
Or you can even install Firefox 58 Developer Edition, which allows you to keep NoScript 5 running on “Quantum” with the extensions.legacy.enabled trick. Just please don’t block your updates on Firefox 56, it would be bad for your security.

Let me repeat that: your safest option for the next few days is Firefox 52 ESR, which will receive security updates until June 2018.

So, for another half-year you there will be two NoScripts: just sort your priorities and choose yours.

Update 2017-11-15

As you probably noticed, yesterday’s today has gone away in most time zones and we’re not ready yet (Murphy law and all) :(
But we’re definitely on track for the end of this week, and in the meanwhile your awesome patience deserves a couple of preview screenshots…
NoScript 10 menu
noscript10-options.png

Update 2017-11-18

The week is not over yet.

* in the next few weeks will move NoScript 10.x source code and bug tracking on GitHub, in the meanwhile please keep using the forum.

By ma1

Hacker, atheist, humanist, dad, mozillian, security breaker and builder, creator of NoScript, casting spells at the Tor Browser. He/him.

487 comments

  1. Hi Giorgio,

    first thing I did after updating to FF57 was checking for NoScript. I’m super happy to see you put your own time in to update NoScript on the same day(!) as Mozilla updates Firefox. That’s WAY better support then most companies deliver. Thank you so much for your great work!

    Best wishes from germany
    Gabriel

  2. It was the first thing I checked for too, updating to 57. I feel naked without it! Keep up the good work Georgio.

  3. Thank You!

    NoScript is a staple and I feel a bit exposed at the moment.

    Long live NoScript and everyone behind the scene!!!

  4. Thanks Giorgio for the reply,
    yeah hopefully it will be available soon …

    So im on Linux, and simply wait 2 days longer befor switching to Firefox 57.

  5. Make sure to update the screenshots on the addons site. The current screenshots are ancient.

  6. Hello nemo!

    I am the original author of bug 1392090. I ran into this problem some time ago, but mozilla does not seem to care. I even asked them to include an API to disable javascript per page: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1367161

    Looking forward for Giogio’s solution as I have asked about this bug in the forum but did not recieve an answer.

    @Giorgo
    Thank you for all of your work in the last decade!

  7. thilo-wolf, there *is* an API to disable javascript per page. A script can flag a page as non-javascript, but set the iframes in it as javascript even. For some reason uMatrix is not using it and locked commenting in the bug. See bz’s comment in the uBlock bug.

    So IMO this is entirely a uMatrix/uBlock problem, it just would be nice if the browser supported uBlock/uMatrix’s expected behaviour WRT CSPs…
    IMO it would be

    And, NoScript I expect is using that API.

  8. Since NoScript has been ported to WebExtensions, do you think that would be possible to run it on Chrome-based browsers? Thank you.

  9. Yikes! I just let Firefox upgrade to v57.0 only to discover NoScript no longer works! NoScript is the main reason I use Firefox in the first place!! I will happily download the new NoScript the instant it’s available and keep you posted about any issues i encounter as a fairly knowledgeable but "normal" (i.e., not an actual geek) user.
    Cheers,
    Eddy

  10. @Phillip, I’m going to bet the answer is "no" since while Mozilla is going out of its way to support Chrome’s APIs, they’ve also added a ton of their own – there’s an open NoScript bug in bugzilla on what new APIs giorgio needs. I subscribed a while ago to see how NoScript failed.

    Just a guess as a user (and donater ☺ ) tho.

  11. Looking forward to get the result of your very appreciated work! NoScript is great! Will go for a further donation when I’m safer (with the new NoScript) with browsing again…

  12. People are shitting their pants because NoScript 10 has not shown up on the AMO. You’re lagging behind the FF release schedule a little, but I guess you need all the time you need to make sure NS works before publishing.

    Good job Giorgio, I wouldn’t be using FF without this add on.

  13. Thank you very, very much for NoScript and still developing it further. I’m deeply grateful that you will adapt to the latest Firefox version!

  14. Thank you for your dedication to Noscript extension, being forced to rewrite code because your underlying platform has changed is not easy, even when those changes are for the best, and more importantly it takes time.
    Have a nice day and thank you for your work, you’re a part of the Firefox ecosystem!

  15. Thank you so much for your great work! This extension is absolutely vital to surf today’s web and I’m very grateful that you guys keep up the burden of maintenance and development! Especially regarding the transition to the WebExtension API that must have more in common with a rewirite than a porting effort. Keep up the great work!

  16. Thanks Giorgio! Just updated to Firefox 57, and can’t wait to add NoScript when available!

    Thanks for an awesome product!

  17. Thank you so much for providing such a high quality extension that adds so much value to our browsing experience, and for taking such quick action to make sure it continues working for us in the new FF. Your work and dedication are much appreciated!

  18. Firefox is nothing without your incredible, essential extension. I share the sentiment of feeling naked without it.

  19. Thank you for your great work, without NoScript I’d be seriously thinking about dropping FF!

    What features will not be availibe in the new release, and which will probably vanish for good, is there a list availible?

    And are there plans to support much more detailed controls for Firefox’ API and HTML5 tags?
    Such as media, geo, observer, experiments, resource, safebrowsing, dom storage, fullscreen, gfx, eme, pdfjs, asmjs, webjs, livecam, webrtc, social and so on, above WebGL and Canvas?

    Those are pretty much completely out-of-reach, due to the missing registry options, with the arrival of FF 57.

    You might have a look at this prefbar plugin extension, to get some additional ideas, too.

    Cheers!

  20. I always like improvements but did not expect to have my work day interrupted by the new firefox. Was disappointed at first to have to use umatrix and I am very pleased to see noscript will have something soon. Nothing against umatrix but I find the interface of NoScript less obtrusive on my screen and easier to use. Thanks for keeping us up to date.

  21. glad to hear about this, I already knew that there will be a WE update so I missed it not being here yet. Like Buck said, I’m temporally using uMatrix but, despite having more options, it’s too much restrictive when blocking things and don’t always show all blocked items (I had to temporary allow all to whitelist scripts).
    Looking forward for the update.

  22. It is 5h30pm Eastern time (Canada). NoScript 10 or 5 are NOT available in Add-Ons section of Firefox. Is there a way to sideload? :-(

  23. Upgraded to Firefox 57 and discovered that NoScript is not available yet – not even the work-around of enabling extensions.legacy.enabled = true works.

    Nope, nope. nope.

    I dropped Firefox 57 on the floor immediately like worthless rubbish and reinstalled Firefox 56.0.1. I’ll wait patiently for NoScript to be ready and then upgrade. Thank you for your efforts.

  24. I will echo much of what has been said above. Most notably, my shock when I upgraded to FF 57 and discovered I had lost Noscript. (Not only this, but another important extension I depend upon.)

    Embarrassingly, I attempted to follow some of the ‘workaround’ suggestions that have been offered here on the site today and only made things go from unhappy to miserable. Changes to about:config did nothing. Installing that development version of FF did nothing but make things worse. Attempting to uninstall and reinstall a different version failed miserably. (Okay, I’m not a power user.)

    The old saying that ‘Patience is a virtue’ is one I should have adhered to. I will now do so, after managing to get my system back to workable (with a few headaches that persist)

    I don’t blame Goirgio as I’m sure he’s doing his best. He even responded to an email immediately this morning. (that blew my away)

    Yeah. Patience is a virtue.

  25. I feel naked without No Script! I am using Firefox Nightly. Today, NoScript 4.1.5rc1 broke today for visiting new websites which do not support https.

  26. I won’t be updating to Firefox 57 until no-script is fully released. A big warm thank you to Giorgio for making such an amazing addon that I can’t live without. May all the quirks and bugs smooth out until release. Thanks again!

  27. Thank you Giorgio for doing what you do! Protecting us from the evils of the internet.

    God bless you and yours.
    Dean

  28. I just want to say THANK YOU admin and team for this, been using FF + NS + adblock combo for 5-10years and it saved my ass so many times browsing naughty sites.

  29. ————-EASY FIX——————

    For those wanting to return to THE N0-script browser, use your system restore until no-script is fixed for the new update.

    Much love Giorgio!

  30. No worries because many people won’t be updating to Firefox 57 anytime soon. The reason? Broken addons.

  31. If you’re stuck with FF57, for whatever reason, you can always completely disable JavaScript in about:config until NoScript is ready for FF57.

    Not ideal, but if you can live with the effects, it’s another option.

  32. Quando está o update pronto ??
    Será realizado até o fim de semana ??
    Uso o NoScript desde o primeiro dia de Noscript ….sem NoScript nao me sinto bem na Netz .
    Sem NoScript me sinto inseguro …!!

  33. Thank you for your hard work in making NoScript for the people!
    Please don’t forget to rest and stay hydrated :)
    The spirits of the wild watch over you.

  34. For their new "Quamtum" Browser Mozilla recommends a replacement for NoScript. If you don’t accept switching to another tool (as NoScript is proven and tested by more than 1 million users) you may simply download and install the previous Firefox version (56.0.2: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/), then you’ll deactivate automatic updates, and you’ll just wait some days until NoScript is available for "Quantum". That’s what I have done. I will update to "Quantum" only if it runs with NoScript. Full stop.

  35. Couldn’t agree more with #38 Hubert Bartels and #43 Higher Power. Did just go back to FF 56.0.2 and was happy to find all of my profile settings still intact. Anyway, strongly advised: profile backups (simply copy / paste the profile folder onto another folder/usb drive) before thinking to change significant things such as migrating to FF 57

    (All) earlier FF versions at: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/

    Many, many thanks to ma1, bless you.

  36. Giorgio, thank you for keep us up to date on your progress. I agree with most of the posters here, NS is the reason I use FF and I will not use FF without it. Keep up the great work!
    Thanks,
    Scott
    NS user since 1.x and donor

  37. I’d like to echo what everyone else has said, and say thank you very much for the work you’re putting into this. Looking forward to NoScript 10!

  38. @Giorgio:

    A little delay is okay in my book.

    What’s most important is that you can provide a thorough and transparent list of NoScript 10’s limitations, even if they will only last a few months, as that will help people decide if they upgrade to Firefox 57 but also how they may alter the way they browse to compensate for limitations. (Maybe adding another add-on, or allowing JavaScript more sparingly, or making uBlockOrigin tougher in blocking content to reduce exposure, …)

    That would help trusting the new NoScript, even once it will be fully featured again, since it’s a complete rewrite running in a less permissive environment.

    Thanks for your work anyway, and congrats too because you not only rebuilt NS from scratch but also implemented a lot of required features into Firefox itself for NS and other add-ons to use.

  39. You don’t know how many times noscript has saved me from $hitty websites, spam, malware, viruses, popups, etc. etc. I’m so stoked to know you’re close to releasing it for Quantum! Thank you! (I donate and everyone else should too)

  40. I’m anxiously awaiting the release, for many reasons. That being said, I am NOT a fan of what the screenshots show: the options being controlled through a webpage instead of a standalone interface. As long as it all works, and is just as easy to manage as always, I’ll be happy. Thank you for making one of the best and most indispensable add-ons ever.

  41. I’m pissed. Mozilla updated to 57 with no warning that noscript would be disabled. Had I known, I would have waited until you guys were ready. Mozilla never allows you to go back to a previous version once you upgrade. How arrogant!

  42. Even though Firefox 57 is supposed to be better/faster, browsing lots of tabs on it feels slow and bloated without NoScript. Now that AdBlockPlus works in Firefox 57, NoScript is all I need for the browser to be complete again. Keep up the great work.

  43. – Thank you so much for Noscript, felt like it safed lives many times – so go ahead :-)
    – Firefox warned a month ago, but as a user you cant do anything than wait and look if it realy happens
    – i dont use FF as long as there is no Noscript, no matter 57 is better or safe as is

    thanks

  44. Thanks for all of your hard work. It’s amazing how vulnerable I feel surfing the web without NoScript. I know you’re in a rush, but no pressure. I have faith your team will release a great product. Keep up the great work everyone!

  45. I uninstalled FF 57.0 and reinstalled FF 56.0.2 with full NoScript 5.1.5.
    I will wait for the new NoScript that works with FF Quantum before I "upgrade" to 57.0 again.
    The main reason I use Mozilla’s Firefox browser is because of the NoScript extension.
    Thanks for all you do,
    Eddy

  46. I wish they would make a tool or a way to export your Noscript settings into a hosts file format.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.

  47. Grande Giorgio!
    Tantissimi saluti dalla Germania a Palermo e tanti auguri per questo bellissimo AddOn tuo, che è una bomba!
    Hi Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for makin NoScript! It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away!!

    THANK YOU SO MUCH, GiORGIO, FOR YOUR GREAT WORK!!!
    YOU SHOULD GET A HIGH PAYED JOB IN SILICON WAY – SICILIANs4TW!!

    Grandissimo, continua cosi! =)

  48. Thank you for your prompt work for this new Firefox edition. You’re right; I do indeed feel naked! :)

  49. I cannot tell you the feeling in my gut I have browsing without NS. Thank you so much for the number 1 add-on, ummmm… Extension for FF. Nothing else comes close. You da Man!

  50. Hi and thanks for noscript and the work you are doing to save us all from the "meanies". Umtrix looks so complicated, it would take me longer than the end of the week to understand it. What do I do? Call me paranoid, but as others have said feel exposed and unsafe. Thanks for any ideas.

  51. More love and appreciation from more happy, grateful users of Noscript. !
    (and of course, anxiously awaiting … )

  52. I forgot how unpleasant the net is without your wonderful addon. Would it be safe to assume the delay is partly due to the new version of firefox being designed to make it harder for programs like yours to work? Seems as if FF has been getting more and more comfortable with surveilance.

  53. Fast Eddy: the problem is that Mozilla (the team behind Firefox) has completely rewritten their interface. Pretty much nothing is the same; APIs have all changed, code has all changed. They estimate they have or will be replacing over 5 million lines of code with the Quantum project.

    NoScript has to translate its current functionality to the new WebExtensions API, some of which is not even released under Firefox 57.

  54. Thank you!

    I was trying to figure out when some of my addons got broken, and thanks to the pre-quantum ESR linked here, I got them working again :D

    Also, thank you for the best addon (set?) to ever grace the web!

  55. Thanks for that extension.

    Any reason why it is not possible to donate via Bitcoin?
    At least there is no BTC-address on the page under "Donate" in the upper right corner.

  56. Hi Giorgio! You are doing an awesome job and yes we are depending on you to keep the bad guys out! Cheers and waiting for an update:)

  57. Thanks so much for your efforts. Too bad Mozilla didn’t let you (or us) know well enough in advance to prepare for this. We don’t like to use this browser WITHOUT NoScript; it’s like going outside naked.

  58. Is there anyway to black list facebook.com and facebook.net?

    Thanks for all the work you put into this G. I will be donating as soon as I get paid.

  59. I feel so naked and vulnerable without NoScript!

    This reminds me, NoScript is fantastic and I’ll be donating to both you and Marcel Bokhorst (M66B) for XPrivacy when my pay clears soon.

    Unlike XPrivacy, I hope you don’t give up on this amazing piece of software!

  60. just a little tip for you all.

    the developer version of Quantum still has legacy support. i’m using 57.0b14 right now WITH NO-SCRIPT.

  61. Hi Giorgio,

    Just this: Thanks a LOT(!) for your Plugin! The rest is silence.

    You put your personal time into this tool. If every user would just donate 1.00 $ to you…Unfortunately it is not possible to donate by bank transfer. Paypal just does not respect privacy so I have no account. How can I donate anyhow?

    I donate to every opensource project I use on a regular basis once a year, because it is really worth it. People put so much effort and time in it. Think of it–just donate your next "pack of cigarettes" to one or the other open source project, donate the 5.00 $. Be fair.

  62. Hi Giorgio! Thank you for working hard on this. We cannot wait to see NoScript back in action. A hello and thank you from Australia!

  63. SAlut de France !
    Hello from France !
    Et merci pour votre boulot énorme !
    And thanks for your excellent job !

    Noscript is one of my favorite extensions !

  64. Hi Giorgio,

    Looks like people are holding off FF updates to wait for NS10. As they should! Having a quick VM look, it turns out that Pale Moon has more working (good) extensions than flashy new FF57. (tempted…)

    Thanks for your tremendous effort (in single handedly rescuing Mozilla? ☺)

    Do you have an ETA for us on NS10?

    Mille grazie!

  65. I would like to only thank you for your great work. Looking forward to new version of noscript. Best browser needs best extension :-)

  66. You kinda forget how much the internet sucks until NS suddenly stops working for a few days and you get flooded with crap you usually don’t see ..

  67. The most important addon for firefox! Just want to give you my appreciation! Looking forward to the new version and will report bugs if I find them! Best regards, wishes and luck!

  68. THANK YOU so much

    for your precious time and work.
    As to Noscript and FX57,
    Good things need time, as they say,
    it should be allready build in that browser anyway !!

    Thanks again, greetings, F.

  69. Just to chime in with the others, thank you for your unbelievable work over the years in making NoScript the first addon i always install on every FF installation i do. This makes me double proud to be a donator as you well deserved it.

    Kind regards, Phil

  70. Thank you so much. NoScript is the most important plugin I have. I’ll never use anything but FireFox, and that’s because of NoScript.

  71. Thank you for all your hard work in making this happen for FF57! Look forward to seeing it working again, it is the only "killer" addon for me. The other three or four I use could be replace with any one of a dozen other, but NoScript is UNIQUE !!

    Jac.

  72. Can someone recommend a different browser,that I can customize the way I want it WITH NoScript of course. This new FF is already top heavy,the old clean look is gone,all my customized add ons are mostly gone,NS was the best advise a rookie please,thanks,All!!

  73. Impressive that you’re as close as you say for such a major update. I set Firefox as my default browser, even though I’m a chrome user, so that if I do something silly like click on a link I shouldn’t have, NoScript stops anything particularly bad from happening.
    I must admit, I’ll have to make some time for Firefox Quantum to see what they’ve done for improvements… but I’m very much looking forward to getting NoScript back up and running. Thank you for all your hard work!

  74. Can you add support for Stripe.com? Would like to make a donation, but I strongly hate Paypal after all the times they have screwed over opensource projects.

    Love your work and can almost not wait to have NS back again! Mozilla should imo have waited a couple of days as this is, if not the most, one of the most important addons.

  75. Waiting anxious NoScript Giorgio. Can you implement a payment gateway for VISA other than PayPal?
    Thks.

  76. @Conz so true! I hope the NS devs take this storm of comments as what it is. NS is possibly one of the most important inventions after the browsers themself. Visiting the web without NS is like if you would exit your house with no clothing and the temp outside is freezing cold, it would not be a delightful experience for long…

  77. If you want NoScript 10 done, stop asking Giorgio questions and asking him to add new features.

    He’s already BUSY, working on finishing NoScript 10 — questions and requests (if he even bothers to look at them) will only slow him down.

    Let him do what he’s doing, and WAIT for him to finish. It’s as simple as that!

  78. I refuse to enable javascript without noscript around. Love the addon, thank you for updating it even through the crazy changes mozilla is making with ff.

  79. You the man! By seeing so much greatful posts within a day, I decided to show my support as this is really really really fast delivery. Thank you so much!

  80. Thanks Giorgio…not sure what a lot of us would do without your expertise and willingness to do what right’s for the whole and not just for one…
    Even understanding what FF is doing with their latest update, not sure if coordination with add-on providers is part of their update model, but it should be…if it’s not already.

    Again Thanks

  81. Won’t browse without NoScript. A little bit upsetting is the fact that mozzilla develops a complete new browser but accepts to be not complete but put it out. The webextension API is missing some low level calls , so NoScript cannot use all the functions it supported before. ;-) I hope they will soon provide the missing low level API !
    Superbst browser extension ever existed !
    Keep it up and so much thanks for your stellar effort !!!
    Greets Komputnik

  82. Hey, I also just want to say thank you! I’ve been using NoScript for years and it’s just awesome!

  83. Firefox is basically useless without NoScript. I can’t even use it now. Hoping for a new version soon.

  84. I too feel naked without NoScript. (I want to keep using Firefox…) Glad to see that you are working on No Script upgrade and looking forward to its release, although make it good first time. So don’t release until ready, within reason. May I suggest putting at least link to this page on the https://noscript.net/ page? (If it’s there I didn’t find it.) Cheers!

  85. Greetings from Germany.
    Thank you for this best Extension….health for you and your Family.
    Good luck.

  86. Thank you for continuing the development of this addon, Giorgio. I have a question: Is there any advantage to running NoScript if I already have uMatrix configured to block all 3rd party domains by default? I’m thinking that the only advantage it would give is blocking the 1st party domain by default, which could easily be configured in uMatrix as well. It’s true that uMatrix requires a little more learning and configuration at the start, but running both addons seems like it would be unnecessary and use up a good chunk of additional memory resources on my system, but I’m not necessarily sure. Any thoughts?

  87. @Ka
    For f*** sake use google, if you want to be micromanaged go somewhere else, like talk to the uMatrix developer!

  88. Thank-you Giorgio. Sometimes recently it is hard to maintain faith in humanity. Good people engineering good products – and for free – is great. Your children must be and will be proud. I mean more than just the natural pride level for being from Sicily! ;-)
    There are many people making money from terrible abusive products who have to lie to their selves, friends, wives/husbands and children. Good man yourself, as we say in Ireland, for (I assume in general), not being one. You save me a lot of money in electricity (saved CPU cycles) each year. Cheers!

  89. @Ka
    i think both uMatrix and NoScript can achieve the same goal but based on a different concept/approach. IMO NoScript’s approach make more sense because if you land on the site that you’ve never visit before, you’re protected whereas uMatrix allow all 1st party domain by default.

  90. Fantastic Add-On. Truly the only reason to use Firefox is this functionality. Why they haven’t bought your code is a mystery. They owe you big time as you have created a benefit to using FF instead of other browsers. Great job and thank you!

  91. I understand Mozilla has been slow with incorporating important APIs for WebExtensions, but wasn’t the webextension delay related to Giorgio splitting NoScript into 2 different addons? 1 for maintaining TorBrowser(v52 ESR) and 1 for WebExtensions(v57+)? I remember reading that Giorgio was working closely with Mozilla on WebExtensions implementations, so it kind of surprised me there were still delays.

  92. Got hacked early this week & NoScript prevented the implants from connecting out.
    Not the first time it’s saved me, won’t be the last. Feeling really exposed until the new version is ready. Ladies & gents – never browse unprotected. The best things really are free.

  93. I miss No Script!! Firefox is useless without it!
    Thank you for your hard work! I’ll wait for it.
    Giorgio: ¡Gracias cabrón!

  94. Thank you very much for the useful software.
    I’m looking forward to the release of "Noscript10"

  95. I’m holding off my FF57 update until NoScript is ready… :) FF update can wait. Thanks for the awesome application.

  96. Well before these NoScript issues, I had a BIG problem with Firefuzz. I used to use a very effective organizing tool, TGM (Task Groups Manager). First, its author, "Alex Shootingstar", seems to have disappeared in the 2011 tsunami. Then, the Firefuzz crew removed a lot of components that TGM needed. Reminds me of NASA’s program to lightweight the Space Shuttle, until Challenger blew up.

    If anyone is interested in reviving TGM, maybe we can get a new Category here on Hackademix. Can anyone tell me how to do that?

  97. @Joshua Zev Levin, Ph.D.,

    Please read through some of the posts on this page. That should answer your question about which previous version of Firefox you should roll back to.

    Also, please take a second and scroll up to the top of this page, to see what’s the purpose of this site — that should answer your question about getting a new category here, to discuss TGM.

    If doing those things doesn’t answer your question, then you may want to request that your alma mater refund the cost of your Ph.D.

  98. Giorgio, Thanks for the update. Mate your work has saved me on many occasions, so I am having to be extra careful now not to get caught out until you are able to iron out the remaining problems with No Script 10. Best of luck and look forward to the finished result. No No Script takes the fun out of browsing.

  99. Ti Ringraziano Tanti…

    E’ una Vera Soddisfazione ;-)

    Giorgio,
    Saluti anche dall’ ITALY, eh eh eh

  100. Hey there, I’d just like to say that I absolutely love Noscript! I didn’t realize how much I relied on it for web protection until the update, as I’ve been absolutely paranoid about websites giving me a virus since. Anyways, thank you for what you’re doing here; I absolutely can’t wait for it to be released!

  101. Giorgio and entire team, just want to say keep going as you are contributing to a better I-world. Your efforts are highly appreciated!!!

  102. I absolutely love noscript. This program bugs my girlfriend, because she doesent like to click on "S" icon (the forse is strong in her, yea right). I tired to explain that Noscript is like an antivirus program, only better, because for the first time, the user gets to choose what is good, whats not.

    Love it. Good work guys. Bummer that my firefox autoupdated.

  103. I have been checking in on this page every day after the FF upgrade. I really miss my NoScript extension. Keep up the good work!

  104. Looking forward to the return of NoScript. I never realized how much crap and popups this was filtering for me.

  105. Hi Showing up here to say hello to developers and users of noscript. Kudos to developers for taking so much effort to transit to web extension version of noscript in the name of safety of all user.

  106. Greetings Giorgio! Using NoScript since 2011 and I’m very happy to have it. Thank you for your amazing work!

  107. Hi Giorgio,

    Totally agree with your nr 1 responder Gabriel. As I noticed f*ing ads populating my screen all of a sudden, like with chrome and Ie, I noticed the absence of you icon.
    WTF! … MOST add-ons are nice to have, there’s just ONE that is a MUST-HAVE, and that’s yours. The knowledge that when visiting a new site I don’t know, it can’t do ANYTHING but display is really reassuring. Especially with all the ransomware nowadays.

    And when a website that I visit frequently tells me their sop-story ‘we depend on ads, blah-di-blah’ and asks me to turn the blocker off, I’ll do it to make the equation more fair.

    So I was all geared up to do a roll back of FF, but luckily I found this site on time.

    — And yeah I donated years ago, but I’ll do it again.

    Thanks for putting so much work in -imo- one of the most important add-ons for a browser ever.
    Bob

  108. THANKS a lot for doing this!!! I like the firefox update and I think it was necessary. Thanks for going through the trouble. You are the best.
    Ciao max

  109. Thank you for all your hard work. You are like a warm blanket on a cold winter’s night to keep us safe from all the bad things on the Internet. There will be an extra gold star in your crown when you get to heaven. Keep up the fantastic work!

  110. @ema – @dylhan – @rocktherack

    Read the post please. They are working hard on it and expect NoScipt 10 to be available very soon. I say that the blame is fully on Mozilla (not the NS developers!) for not waiting just a couple of days for NS to be ready. This addon is of such huge importance to users that Mozilla should have waited. Counting addon installs are a faulty metrics as most addons are addons that the user can live without or where it exist good replacements, NoScript is a must-have with nothing that comes close to what it has to offer.

  111. @ema – @dylhan – @rocktherack

    Read the post please. They are working hard on it and expect NoScipt 10 to be available very soon. I say that the blame is fully on Mozilla (not the NS developers!) for not waiting just a couple of days for NS to be ready. This addon is of such huge importance to users that Mozilla should have waited. Counting addon installs are a faulty metrics as most addons are addons that the user can live without (mostly for entertainment or customizations and of similar low importance) or where it exist good replacements, NoScript is a must-have security suite with nothing that comes close to what it has to offer.

  112. Without NoScript protecting me I am afraid of the internet. It’s been YEARS since I went without it. Now I remember why I love it so much!

    I tried to visit a site I frequent after the Auto Update to 57 and got both pop ups and redirects. Within 4 clicks I had another page open trying to make me install another firefox update. Obviously a scam/malware update.

    I need you NoScript! Save me from the evils of the interwebs please!

  113. I wasn’t aware how much better the internet is with noscript until I updated to FF57. You are making the internet a better, safer, less stressful place. THANK YOU!

    For the first time I’m going to click a "donate" button – you deserve it for enhancing our internet experience for so many years.

  114. First thing I did after firefox updated and there was not a working NoScript, downgraded back to the last working firefox noscript version. That is how much I use and need this program! Thanks for all the work on one of the staple firefox extensions.

  115. Please keep working on the Noscript update for Firefox 57! It really does improve and provides much needed safety browsing the web!

  116. Hey Giorgio,

    I see i’m not the only to struggle with this major transition :) And yes, in those cases, Murphy law is definitely not a legend !

    Good luck !!!

  117. I’ve been using NoScript for years now, didn’t realise how "naked" I would feel now that I’m running around waiting for latest version.

    Thanks for the hard work.

  118. Yeah… Still not ready!
    I’m gonna build my own with blackjack and hookers! … In fact, forget the blackjack!

  119. Tried Firefox Quantum without NoScript. Had no idea what a shitshow the internet has become! Half hour later I switched back to Firefox 56 WITH NoScript. Just can’t do without. Waiting patiently so I can re-upgrade.

  120. Absolutely agree with post #183 , system restored to Firefox 56 and will review situation when new NoScript available . Bit of a nuisance what happened to Foxy Proxy as well . Thank you for all the hard work , I’m a UK OAP but I have made a small donation previously to NoScript .

  121. Parabéns pelo trabalho. Quando se acostuma com o NoScript, ficar sem é difícil! Aguardando ansiosamente!
    Thank you so much for ur hard work!

  122. I will give this a day or two to be updated before I downgrade firefox. honestly I wish they’d given me the option of waiting before they forcibly updated my browser.

  123. Sum Gai: They do give you an option. It’s called turning off automatic updates.

  124. Thanks for all your hard work. Most important extension for FF. I have donated and I hope others will too.

  125. With FF57 and the old No Script not working, I have a greater appreciation for the developer. No Script is a must. Like others have said, I feel "nekkid" without it now! Can’t wait for the FF57 version to come out. I will now donate more often as once No Script is gone, I realized how important it is.

  126. Made the mistake of clicking "update" wihtout checking, now stuck with 57 and can’t browse without NoScript. Hope it will be ready soon.

    BTW, excluding some visual changes, 57 is eaxctly the same as 56.* versions. Same massive memory hog even without addons, couldnt find the slightest difference in speed.

  127. Hey Giorgio and all other behind NoScript,
    great to hear you’re on the track to a new version which is compatible to the new FF. I’m using NoScript for ages and it did an awsome job; can’t live without it anymore… so I feel kind of naked right now :-D
    I want to use this situation the give you a big "Thank You"! Keep on the great work!

  128. Giorgio and team, thank you so much for your hard work. We downgraded to FF56 to continue using your app and had to allow certain permissions to allow this comment. Just the way we like it. Safe and Secure. Keep up the good work and where’s your paypal donation button…..

  129. The past few days have been educational. I under appreciated how fast sites load when scripts are disabled. The unconstrained scripts are pervasive. Scripts open new windows, new tabs, play videos with the volume maxed out. Even after I close all of the tabs there must be scripts running because something keeps pegging one of the cores in CPU. Restarting Firefox abates this this last issue for awhile. Keep up the good work. I’m looking forward having NoScript again.

  130. Moin from Germany,

    Jungs, macht keinen Scheiss und bringt das EINZIG WIRKLICH WICHTIGE Addon wieder online !

  131. I believe that NoScript should be permanently added into Firefox, it’s critical to the functionality of the browser. You should work with the developers to integrate it into the browser permanently. there are reasons why this is a good idea, security and guarantee that its always working and can’t be uninstalled, and that theres no gaps in coverage like there is now.

  132. Girgio and team, thanks for your work and look forward to the v57+ compatible noscript. However, I moved to umatrix till the new version is released. Thumbs up guys!

  133. OK, I installed FF 52.5 ESR- and NoScript was still disabled with no option for being re-enabled, so I had to re-install NoScript as well.

    There is another extension called NoScript Something on Mozilla’s Extension page (not the one I wanted), so check carefully before installing that you have selected the one you actually want.

  134. Thx for your plugin. I use it for many many years and it kept me save for all the long way. So this is time to say thank you for your hard work! Keep it up!
    Cheers Pete

  135. I’ve been paying for house and car insurance every year for years and never had occasion to use them, thankfully. Until now I’d never paid to support noscript, and yet it has genuinely protected me from all sorts of tracking and threats daily for just as long. I’ve just donated… I should have done so a long time ago. Mozilla claims to make the safest browser, but it’s Giorgio that makes it the safest, not Mozilla. I don’t care whether I use Firefox or Pale Moon or whatever; but it’s got to run noscript. Giorgio, I’m truly indebted to you as are many others for making the web a safer place to browse. Keep up the great work!

  136. I’ve never donated for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and anonymoX

    All the best to you. Looking forward to Noscript for Firefox Quantum
    Kind regards Zantro

  137. Thanks for all your hard work for a ‘little’ add-on.
    Firefox is useless without it.

    Please think of people using Keepa, and make it possible to use Keepa with Noscript, like in the first days… this would be our 2017 christmas gift :)

  138. You know, you’d think firefox would have integrated something like this already if it’s causing this much of an issue among people. then again, I guess most people who like using it are on TOR by now…

  139. hello team,
    I feel like i’m naked using FF57 without NoScript.
    Hope you’ll able to release some stable version and do not get lot of troubles from FF57 to deliver the first add-on that anyone must install on FF.
    thank’s a lot for the job done all those years.

  140. I feel much better now. Uninstalled 57 …reinstalled 56.0.2…and poof, just like that noscript is back. And I even remembered to copy my profile before doing that. Move the profile back into the folder and wham…back in business. I changed the auto update to just let me know, and it is actually asking me to upgrade again….No thanks, at least until you guys get NS10 figured out. Thanks again to everyone. Highly recommended.

    HEHEHEHE… I forgot to let noscript in. I had to retype my post. 3 times before I figured out why as I had resigned myself to life without you.

  141. Its the end of the week. Im getting worried. If this gets set back for a while are there any other plugins that do anything similar and make firefox usable?

  142. @Gaius

    Not that I’m aware of. Searching the firefox addons gives some results, but nothing of relevance afaik. What I’ve done is just disabling javascript altogether, with the disadvantage that many sites won’t work at all or just partly works. If you’re ok with that you can by:

    1. Open about:config
    2. Search for javascript.enabled
    3. Doubleclick on the line so the value change from true to false

    If you want to enable javascript again, just doubleclick on the line again.

    Remember to change it back to default when NoScript 10 is available.

  143. I wasn’t even aware in recent years how useless Firefox is without this addon. Thanks for your work.

  144. Long time Noscript user. I didn’t know uMatrix until Tuesday, but after being pointed to it as a possible replacement on the day FF57 was released I now like it. The way the ‘matrix’ concept has been implemented offers a lot of control over what to load from what resource. That said, I will have a good look at Noscript 10 once it has been released. Just my opinion, YMMV.

  145. Brave browser has NoScript built in, great FF replacement until things work correctly again.

  146. "Brave browser has NoScript built in, great FF replacement until things work correctly again."

    I can’t find any evidence of that. Link, please.

  147. One usually appreciates something the most, when it is gone (even if it is temporary). This is a great example. I feel really exposed without noscript now ;) So I would like to use this opportunity to thank you for your ongoing work and wish you all the best!

  148. Please make Noscript 10 similar to the old version. The usability of the old addon was just simple and straightforward! Thank you for your great work.

  149. Awesome! Thanks EFF for supporting and updating NS; I feel vulnerable browsing without it and will be downloading it as soon as it’s available.

  150. Hi Georgio. It is a real disappointment to know that, after all these years of your plug-in being really the only one recommended by the best security experts, you are now leaving us unprotected. The WebExtension APIs for Firefox 57 were published months ago.

  151. Nate – I’m sure they’d be willing to offer you a full refund.

    (Are you seriously going to pull this entitled BS on a FREE add-on? Cry more.)

  152. "You don’t realize how much you love something… until it’s GONE!"

    I LOVE NoScript and I’m happy to wait until you’re happy enough with NS 10 to release it. No worries… take whatever time you need… and do what you gotta do. I downloaded Firefox 52.5 ESR, re-installed NoScript, and everything is working fine. It was easy.

    Thank-you for all your work. Sincerely. And I’ll be HAPPY to make a donation to thank-you for all your hard work on the new version. It’s the ONLY add-on I absolutely need before using Firefox 57.0!! :-)

  153. Hi Giorgio,

    Keep up the good work. Until 10 is out I am switching to Pale Moon with the old NS. I am awaiting for the new release too.

  154. @mrsugg
    @Gaius
    anyone who feels a bit bewildered.

    Please do forgive too much information, but I get the feeling that too many people are relying
    on an insecure Fx version while they wait for NS Quantum.

    While you’re waiting but still want to experience the Web as Giorgio has enabled for us for the last 10+ years (what a champion!)the best (ie securest) advice for you both is to get yourselves an ESR 52.5.0 version, which covers all the security patches that have been made for 57 along with a fully updated set of NS changes.
    56 isn’t, repeat isn’t, patched securely any more. The last thing you need is for some nasty site
    to crash Fx on you and get access to your system – even though the odds of that are quite remote if
    you haven’t ‘trusted’ that site with NS.

    Save your current profile; delete Fx; get ESR 52.5.0 from the great range here:
    https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/all/
    Start ESR 52.5.0
    Close ESR 52.5.0
    Replace profile with your saved one.
    Rinse and go back to a safer and cleaner Web until NS Quantum turns up for you to carry into
    the future as the best Web shield.

    And mind you backup that profile at every step until you settle on your longterm Fx again!

  155. Mike, first of all, who’s "They"? And who said I was going to "pull this entitled BS on a FREE add-on". Way to put your own word in my mouth. Got anymore nonsense to waste with your online presence?

  156. Yay! I want a full refund too :)

    Thank’s Giorgio for this addon
    It’s now that it is not available that I take the time to thank you for your work.
    I feel really ashamed for that.
    Can’t wait to have my favorite addon back, you’re the reason why I use firefox, so i’t not the same without you !

    Thanks again !

  157. Sending lots of good wishes and energy to the developer that you can finish soon the upgraded version. :-)

  158. in the waiting time, just a quick question, i have lost my ability to use no Script for about a month now, on the previous update. Well now that FF57 is all over, no need to ask for something but did anyone have the same problem?
    PS i haven’t waited for an add-on this long, i keep on earing about great addons on Chrome (about many different domains) but i can’t resolve to use it :D , even if FF can climb up to 8GB of RAM over a weekend when left alone on my work pc…

  159. NS vanishing after that update is covered on the main NS landing page; it is an easy fix and NS stays in place afterwards Just follow the embedded link and do what it says.

    I feel guilty about not donating so this and several other wonderful programs, but 17 years of chronic illness, and a new, THIRD chronic illness stopping me from any sort of work, I am nearly penniless, and have to prioritise what little I do have on my young daughter.

  160. Giotgio… take your time, dont rush man.. the good things always come, when have to come… so keep working … and when you are ready… shout out..;)

  161. Hey Giorgio, no problems. Take your time. We trust in your work and things are under control. :D
    By the way, thank you so much for NoScript and all!!! Grazie!!!

  162. As a software developer of many years, I realize what a contribution you’ve been making to the world for years, and I understand the enormous effort that’s gone into NoScript over time.

    However, as a software developer of many years, I’ve also participated in enormous software disasters, including situations where a release was due "at the end of the week," but ended up being postponed for months.

    Since this release is so important to so many people, I’m requesting an honest assessment of where the development effort stands. Are we looking at a delay of a few days, or a few weeks and months?

  163. Like everyone else I’ve been on here ever since my Firefox was updated and there was no NoScript icon to be seen. What a relief to know Giorgio is keeping up the good work – huge thanks for your efforts. I look forward to the new Firefox but without (even better) NoScript it will be half the browser it was, so I’m checking back regularly while making do with Chrome for the next few days.

  164. Hello there,

    Giorgio, I cannot wait wait for the new version.
    You’ve given us a one great tool and BIG THANK YOU for that.

    Keep it real!

    Best regards

    Mars

  165. Thank you very much for your fantastic and trustful work. First time I spend some money in freeware. As many thanks for the past. Your software is irreplaceable and makes the digital world a bit safer! Thank you very much Giorgio and Team! Many Greets from Germany

    Btw… Sorry for your italien-soccer-team. I’m soooo sorry ;)

  166. Simply, I can not using firefox with NoScript ..
    Thank you so much for your awesome work ..
    Greets From EGYPT

  167. Thanks for your work. I love it. The onest tool that give eme a chance for control what happen on my laptop. Many many thanks. Also greetings from Germany

  168. Add me to the list of people who donated to NoScript! I had no idea how many ads it prevented me from seeing and I’m hesitant to do anything on the internet without the new update, so I hope that it comes soon.

  169. Thank you very much for this great add-on and all your hard work. Considering that a lot of malware is served by javascript these days, browsing is a lot safer with Noscript.

  170. Thank you for your great work. I like NoScript. It gives me the potential to choose the scripts myself and so not being passivly delivered. I like to donate, but not with paypal.

  171. great work!!! I’d like to say thank you to you Giorgio for your work in making the net a safer please. I have even started telling my children to watch out for the "snake" when they surf the net.

  172. You know since months that you need to update NoScript for FF57 and you know the release date for the Firefox update!!

  173. Jimmy, make me a sandwich. I know I’ve not paid you a cent or provided you any resources, help, etc. – but you’ve known for months there are hungry people and you’ve not done anything about it!!

  174. Keep up the good work Giorgio and team! Will most definitely make a donation, hell I’ll even consider PayPal if that’s the only donation option!
    Greetings from Sweden! :D

  175. I have a warm fuzzy feeling from donating to y’all. NoScript is the only way to travel. THANK YOUUUUU!

  176. THE HELL IS GOING ON?!?

    STOP LYING TO PEOPLE WHERE IS THE PRODUCT?!?

    YOU’RE NOT A FALLOUT 4 MOD, PEOPLE ACTUALLY PAY, PAY SEE THAT WORD PA-MUTHAFUCKIN AYAYEEE YOU BUDSKIES!

    OUR WAY OR HIGHWAY, WE WALK IF IT’S NOT RELEASED AND FUNCTIONAL WITHIN 48 HOURS!

  177. User "Dick" stays true to his name, both in content and form (caps lock ftw). We’re all waiting, but more patiently so.

  178. Giorgio, I tried to get your NoScript 10, but no success — all I’ve got is: THIS ADD-ON IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH YOUR VERSION OF FIREFOX. (NOT COMPATIBLE WITH FIREFOX QUANTUM).

    You mentioned that you made NoScript 10, to run on Firefox 57/Quantum. True or not?

  179. Having been involved in many software projects, including some
    disasters, here’s my take about what’s going on:

    * On Monday, they had a list of things that had to be done, and they
    thought the would meet the Friday deadline.

    * During the week, they were working almost 24 hours a day to finish,
    but things got added to the list that they had forgotten about.

    * By Friday, it was clear that they weren’t going to be ready. In the
    worst case scenario, they discovered a major flaw in the design that
    means the product won’t work at all. So they all went to bed to get
    some sleep, and leave until today how to deal with the disaster.

    * Today, they’re sitting in a conference room (or meeting online) to
    discuss what to do. They’ll be looking at releasing an incomplete
    product, and they’ll even be considering whether it’s possible
    somehow to get the old version working in the new FF.

    * Once they come up with a disaster recovery strategy, they’ll
    announce it, probably within 24 hours.

    Of course that’s just speculation. Maybe they’ll announce the release
    of the finished product instead. Wouldn’t that be nice?

  180. Really appreciate your hard work over all the years! Take your time on this version. And don’t mind the bullies and whiners who are complaining that the latest version of your free, open source, and amazing program isn’t out when they want it to be.

  181. Thank you so much for working on an update! I have been using no script for years. It’s the first thing I check for when Firefox is updated and with the newest update I was like WTF??? I cannot imagine using Firefox without it! Thanks again!

  182. In the meantime I tried the suggested uMatrix. It’s actually not that bad, it can be used to bypass the time until noscript is ready.
    After many years of using noscript, I felt completely vulnerable without scripting protection. If you go for uMatrix make sure to delete:
    * 1st-party * allow
    * 1st-party frame allow
    in your rules settings and you have the same as noscript.
    I’ll like noscript much better and will definitely switch back as soon as it’s ready – just for the meantime.
    Stay safe :)

  183. The update originally suggested the possibility of same day availability but clearly there were contingencies. Apparently the "definitely by the end of the week" is out as well. I think the lack of communication after being fed the hope of a quick fix is what’s provoking some of the less patient posts here. The way this is unfolding belies the respect for a market that has enjoyed a product whose function is clearly appreciated.

    Bad news would be better than no news that leaves us hanging after being fed hope that could not be fulfilled.

  184. Decided to roll v.56.0.2 back to ESR 52.5.0 just to be safer.

    November 17th, 2017 at 4:43 am LBattis wrote:
    Promptly rolled Firefox back to v.56.0.2 . . .
    NoScript? Never Leave Home Without It!

  185. "Apparently the "definitely by the end of the week" is out as well. "

    According to the majority of countries and the ISO standard, Monday is the first day of the week, meaning Sunday is definitely the end of the week, which is tomorrow. So cut the developers some slack ;) (Also: it’s called the weekend not for nothing…)

    A big Thanks to the developers of NoScript, keep up the good work!

  186. think about accepting donaitions via cryptocurrencies.
    Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dash, Monero.
    security paranoid people dont use paypal :-)

  187. Mostly positive comments here, but some truly buttholes here as well. To the few buttholes: Go away please, you help nobody by being a ass!

    There are some workarounds Giorgio suggested while we wait, read the post please! Even disabling all javascript is a possibility.The world ain’t stopping just because we have to wait some days or have to do some workarounds in the mean time. Give Giorgio some space, and calm down. I’m sure we’ll have a solution soon enough! :)

  188. Love noscript. Can’t wait for it to be available for the current version of Firefox.

    In the meantime, I’m using SeaMonkey with noscript enabled, which is a great little browser on it’s own.

  189. Let’s just wait until it is done. It will most probably be done these days.
    Sometimes bugs or oversights come up close to the aspired end of a development period… And then you got to fix them – and rushing those fixes usually makes the problems bigger.

    Also – a developer still is a human being. Which means, he can also be having others things to do all of a sudden.

    Just wait… :)

  190. Ppl need to direct their anger at mozilla, Giorgio told us what 2 do if u wanted FF with NoScript, that being said an update would be very appreciated. Also as suggested try uMatrix in the meantime, its interface is a little cumbersome but works much the same way. Took a few minutes to figure it out and don’t remember many must-block scripts so have to micro-manage but better than nothing. Thanks staff at NoScript.

  191. Ditto on Asi (#284) and many others comment :
    >Really appreciate your hard work over all the years! Take your time on this version. And don’t mind the bullies and whiners who are complaining that the latest version of your free, open source, and amazing program isn’t out when they want it to be.

    Like many others, I feel naked without NS.
    I wasn’t a donor until now, but will be once the new NS is launched.
    THANK YOU !!!

  192. I appreciate what you do! Not in a position to donate at the moment but thanks for all your hard work!

  193. I do find it strange that after having many months to get this ready, we’ve run into this major delay.

    Not going to be critical of the writer, but I’d like to hear exactly why this wasn’t ready to go?

    Did mozilla change something at the end, or was there some major hurdle that couldn’t be worked out?

    No need for mystery as to the reason.

  194. People, stop bitching and give the developers some time to bring us as much polished product as possible. You can just stick with FF 56 or whatever in the meantime.

    (I wonder how many of the most loud [read: annoying] people here have actually donated.)

  195. @Jim Firefox:
    Why did you post without bothering to do ANY research first? The answers to your snarky quesiions are all over the Internet, and they are also all over these comments. You and all the other people who post snarky quesions here should ry reading a little before you post. Then they and you might have a chance at appearing intelligent, instead of entitled, lazy, ignorant, and obtuse.

  196. First off, thank you for the time and energy you put into this program. Having not had it the past several days reminds me just how vital it is to me. I’ve worked behind the scenes on things before myself and know how often that can go unappreciated, as folks don’t always realize the effort that goes into a finished product.

    Secondly, to folks who are irate, I might remind you that there are often unforeseen issues that can not be fully determined until the program is actually tried out, which they likely could not DO until 57 was released. Also, keep in mind that there was a time when patches for issues could take months and months; having to wait a few days while they work out the bugs is a small price to pay. Be patient. These are good folks working to resolve the issue when many might have decided not to; I’ve seen a great many programs and projects go to the wayside and stop updating, so try to appreciate the fact that they ARE striving to keep updated.

  197. I installed Firefox ver ESR 52.5.5,but when I log off,or restart my computer,it updates to the Firefox ver 57.I tried looking in how to prevent updating,but couldn’t find anything.

  198. To all you people getting your panties in a knot, lighten up! How do you pay for free software? Notice the link on the NoScript page? Know what "donate" means? Giorgio has been kind enough to offer this add on for FREE. What about his other commitments like his job and family? You expect him to drop everything, work 24 hours a day because you "paid"? If you don’t like it, don’t let the door hit you on the way out…

    I’d rather wait and be assured that the developer has covered all angles, and the add on works as it should. Regarding Quantum? I’ve been using it with Ghostery, Decentraleyes, and HTTPS everywhere. I find it super fast and have no issues. Along with my other security software and a custom hosts file going through a VPN, I don’t feel any more vulnerable. I also don’t use Facebook or any of the other sketchy social networking sites or apps.

    Looking forward to a new and improved NoScript. Thank Giorgio :)

  199. Giorgio, thank you for your work! I have no problem staying with FF56 until you are ready to release NoScript 10.

  200. Oh, I’m so glad that you are working on the newest version to go with Firefox’s latest attempt to block your program.
    I was so angry that they disabled it with their ‘speedy, lightning fast’ new build.
    I know it was deliberate on their part, too-because they want everyone to get loaded up with garbage. I’m eagerly awaiting the new build!

  201. I hope that you’re on the mofo. I went to familiar websites and they are loading a ton of crap that I had been unaware of using NoScript. You have done a great job of making my browser work fast and the way I wanted. Keep it up.
    Is there a way of getting videos to work. I usually do not allow more than a top domain. The Chive videos are forever obscured when I’m using NoScript. Someone must know the entrance to the tunnel and how likely I am to die.

  202. @Wrinkly: Yep, it’s funny how people in some countries tend to think that the week ends on Saturday everywhere in the world :D

  203. There are no weekends while in IT. Nor days for that matter. 7x24x365
    We applaud your effort and thank you for your outstanding product.
    Now it is Sunday, November 19th at 0312.

    Get back to work!

    Oh and have a Happy Thanksgiving!

  204. После обновления Firefox 57 больше не работает ваше дополнение. ИСПРАВЬТЕ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА

  205. hihi – I update now more times a day and its tensioning like a race or like Flash Gorden series: "Will he be able to success? Will he manage to safe the world within time?"
    And of course: Grazie millle Giorgio perque tu es il mellio :-) (excuse translation issues – thx)

  206. I 2nd the vote (post #292) for SeaMonkey with noscript enabled as a temporary solution; however, if you are dependent on quite a number of other Firefox add-ons/extensions, many of them are not compatible with SeaMonkey, including my holiday shopping favorite Ebates.

  207. Hey Giorgio. Don´t bother if you can´t hold the release date by the end of this week.

    1. It´s THE #1 must have tool for everybody. So people simply have to wait till it´s done, basta !
    2. Nobody can dare to have any regresses on your work, if they haven´t payed a full price.
    3. It´s sunday ! Lean back enjoy yourself and get your mind free for a day.
    4. I fell naked aswell, like somebody rippt away my pants or something, but dude … that´s the best advertisement I´ve ever … "felt" !?

    Looking very much forward till you´re ready to release the new NoScript 10.

    Best wishes and keep up the outstanding good work. You saved the world … again :-)

  208. @ruff
    If it’s not working yet, it’s not working yet. We’ll just have to wait till it is ready, hopefully that will be soon.

    @People that are able to make a donation:
    I’m sure the vast majority here now understand the importance of this addon, NS is one of the few things that are easy to take for granted that we clearly should not. So please, please, consider making a donation when NoScript 10 is ready!

    If you can’t give a monetary gift, maybe there are other areas where you can help? Translation, development, webdesign, other?

  209. Thanks for doing this. No Script is, by far and away, one of the best extensions for firefox.

    Thanks for doing this!

    James

  210. Yeah no problems. I switch to chrome with script safe so wont need No Script. Good luck hope it comes back out someday

  211. @Wrinkly and @qwent

    Where on Earth does the week end on Saturday ? For me the week begins on Monday which suggests the last day is Sunday; this is much of the world. Americans tend to think of Sunday being the first day of the week. Ah, but maybe you mean Saturday is the last day of the week. That would make sense indeed as that’s how it is in America – but definitely not the world over! But I suppose that goes for a lot of things and to be fair Americans aren’t the only ones doing that kind of thing; it’s not even just the calendar.

    Nevertheless in software sometimes patience is required. As a programmer I am also a user and too often I see devs and users do not exist in harmony and it’s to the detriment of all involved! Patience is also important because you want quality over quantity. Many users don’t understand that and sadly many developers don’t either.

  212. @Cody: Nah, Sunday is the last day in America too. The work week begins on a Monday, Friday is considered the end of the WORK week (Mon – Fri is "business days"), but the actual end of the week is Sunday.

  213. Cody, not Americans tend to think it, for every Christian just as for the Jews the first day of the week is Sunday.

  214. Reserving my real anger for Mozilla…. for surprising us with this. Surely they could offer a compatibility check before an update is installed… no?

  215. Well, I can’t surf naked any longer, so I’ve installed uBlockOrigin. It’s not NoScript, but it helps with some of the more egregious background requests and stuff.

    Hopefully the new NoScript will be finished and out soon. But uBlock seems like a decent figleaf.

  216. @Chef (#322) – You, germans are idiots. Learn more english and about IIWW, especially about german death camps.

  217. @Jolma Mansemenk (#336) : U’re totally fucked up, dude, assaulting someone who offers help, only on the basis of his nationality. U know 70 years have passed since WWII right ?

  218. I decided to install uMatrix for the time-being. I deleted all the default allow rules so that it blocks everything by default and then I only allow what is needed. I hope NoScript will be released soon.

  219. Thank you for your effort, NS is eagerly-awaited!

    In regards to #336: Godwin’s law! This comment section has officially become too old.
    BTW there’s an new post of Georgio in case you missed it…

  220. I won’t temporarily swith browsers because FF is the only one I trust (kind of). I need noscript. Please release something (anything you have) asap. It does not have to be perfect yet and won’t have to work entirely. You can make it perfect later.

    Please, please please. I will kiss all your toes. Honest.

  221. Thank you for your effort, NS is eagerly-awaited!

    In regards to #336: Godwin’s law! This comment section has officially become too old.
    BTW there’s an new post of Georgio in case you missed it…

    Then link it up, or it’s just another no info statement

  222. ‘definitely by the end of this week’

    Missed it, don’t promise deadlines that you can’y meet. Not like you knew this wasn’t coming.

  223. I would like to say thanks for all ya hard work i don’t normally brown nose but i don’t care about the deadline ya set as long as its stable when it comes and should be the attitude for all awaiting this progg appreciate don’t moan at these people who give you a free progg that is a god send,
    keep fighting the good fight and ignore the nay Sayers.
    maby those who have been impatient block the ip for a download wining fers.

  224. To Mozilla:

    How come the new browser does not have the NoScript built-in or there is no transition plan for top addons? You are on the same team, Mozilla! You left the browser naked. Why?

    I have kept Firefox because of NoScript, otherwise I would not use it. Consider that. Think of it carefullly. You should have forked NoScript and made it built-in if you could not maintain compatibility. Then the author could continue his work there. He has *a lot of work* to do because everyday there are thousands who target this thing. This addon is an essential part for Tor browser also. It offers a very important functionality.

  225. I’ve never donated for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and

    THANK YOU SO MUCH, GiORGIO, FOR YOUR GREAT WORK!!!
    I’ve never donated for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) andI’ve never donated for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) andd for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and

    THANK YOU SO MUCH, GiORGIO, FOR YOUR GREAT WORK!!!
    I’ve never donated for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) andI’ve never donated for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) andd for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and

    THANK YOU SO MUCH, GiORGIO, FOR YOUR GREAT WORK!!!
    I’ve never donated for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) andI’ve never donated for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) andd for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and

    THANK YOU SO MUCH, GiORGIO, FOR YOUR GREAT WORK!!!
    I’ve never donated for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) andI’ve never donated for a plugin or something like an addon for a browser, but I just did.
    The last few days with firefox 57 without your addon had shown how important your addon is!
    Please keep up the good work!!!
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times NoScript has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.
    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.
    Now Chrome andare blocked from going there too.
    use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of " Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever) and
    I know a single donation can’t compensate your mission to try making firefox more secure, but I’, using your addon for the past few years and I’m really happy with it.
    I’m used to work with Firefox as my default browser for years with Noscript, Ghostery, uBlock, AddBlock and Giorgio!
    Thank you so much for It has become the absolute Must-Have Addon for Firefox and if the guys at Firefox would have more class, they’d hire you as an INTEGRAL part of Firefox. Because, without you, Firefox would be worth only 50%!!
    Unlimited times has literally saved my ass, or I was able to circumvent the most-evil invasive-ADs. Sometimes, I had to play around with the settings of NoScript, like using an old machine, where you try to turn some switches ON and OFF. In the end, in 95% of most cases, I was able to get a relaxes internet-experience without evil mechanisms, which draw my attention away.

    Something like convert Block google.ads.com to

    0.0.0.0 google.ads.com

    Not just for this transition period but for functional compatibility with other browsers.

    For example:

    If it’s blocked in Firefox I export that to a compatible hosts file list and add it to my hosts file.

    Now Chrome and Edgeless are blocked from going there too.

    I use a custom hosts file already but it doesn’t catch 100% of everything like Noscript does.Later today In a couple of days, if everything goes fine, and definitely by the end of this week, NoScript 10, the first "pure" version, will be finally released for Firefox 57 and above, after years of work and months 5.x living as a hybrid one to allow for smooth user data migration.

    NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.

    If you’re not bothered by change, you’re ready to report bugs* and you’re not super-paranoid about the whole lot of "NoScript Security Suite" most arcane features, NoScript 10 is worth the migration: active content blocking (now more configurable than ever)

    !Is the answer GHOSTBUSTERS 2

  226. I hope NS is available soon. I was just hit by some drive-by ransomware! I had uBlock Origin enabled, but that didn’t help.
    I had reminded myself a few days ago not to go to any untrusted/unknown sites, but I forgot my own advice and suffered the consequences of surfing naked. I forgot how vulnerable a browser is to scripts!
    NS should be required for FireFox if they are going to remain vulnerable.
    It feels strange that I didn’t have to allow scripts to be able to post here.

  227. Today has made me appreciate how much I’ve relied on noscript for I don’t know how many years. Thank you for all the work that you do.

  228. Living without NoScript for over a week now, reminded me how ugly the web actually is. There are just so many websites I wouldn’t visit ever again without control over the things happening there…

  229. AAAH! I feel naked without it but I cannot go back to the slow-as-sh!t FF versions!
    PLEASE hurry, but take your time so it´s not too buggy. ;)

  230. @cody the week is 7 days not Monday to Sunday buddie so 14+ 7 =21 not that as explained in my previous post give a hog tied dropping on a spit roasted nip as long as its usable take all the time it requires i say im just clarifying not having a pop ok cody :) i hope you don’t mind.

  231. Just wanted to say thank you very much. I have switched to FF 52ESR so that I can use noscript. I just do not feel safe without it. Thank you for all your hard work and I pray that others will be patient and not grieve you much.

  232. oh and to add also if its a bank week you cannot count weekend in the uk also lol ( a working week) 9 days.

  233. Thanks, Georgio, for many years of safe browsing. I’m looking forward to NoScript 10. Keep up the good work…:)

  234. Hi AA…

    You obviously have never ever written a single line of code, because then you would know that there is NEVER a sure date.

  235. when will you approximately make the new release available? like Thursday or Friday maybe? can we get a lil bit of more info about that, please? :)

  236. @Anon :

    Giving dates is a dangerous thing… it’ll be finished when the author deems it so. Not before, and not later :)

    The closest we get at this point is probably "Soon™" :D

  237. It *is* necessary to give some kind of update and a bit more information about the hold-ups. I say this because the usual rule seems to be that anything down for a week is dead forever. I remember sites ranging from SyFy to the ACLU abruptly announcing that their forums were closed down for a couple of weeks … the latter came back up a few years later, the former not at all. Unless you keep your audience, the point of having an update at all quickly goes away.

    We thought the internet was going to be an age of freedom, but thanks to the duplicity of the computer scientists, it is more like the redefinition of a book. When I was a kid people said a book was a helpful resource; you could open it just out of curiosity and see something new. Now they should teach kids that a book is a dangerous thing, an evil thing, something that demands a contract that could brand you for life just for looking at it, or wipe out whatever else you had on any device to read it, that continually watches you, that is finding out things about you while doing nothing for you but trying to make you click on it to let it. Tell the kids that a book is not something you read to learn something new, but something you submit to to show your loyalty if you are absolutely sure that it says exactly what your masters want you to believe.

  238. thx for the hard work. i am using it for some years already. it never made any problems, is easy to use and gives me a feeling of safety and privacy in the web.

    at first people made jokes about me being paranoid, now they ask me were to get it and how to use it.

    since i am a software developer myself i feel with you regarding the delay in the release.

    looking forward to being able to use it again soon with the new firefox. to get back this feeling of safety and control of what the websites i visit are allowed to do and to track.

  239. Thank for your hard work. Do not listen to the annoying People. best regards from Switzerland :-)

  240. @AA No matter what you (as a developer) do, you always make it wrong for someone. Just take a look at #364 or #343 and #366 or #369:

    If you make an announcement, people will take it as a fact and expect you to deliver on date. If you then, for which ever reason, are delayed, they will complain (#364 or #343).

    If you make no announcement, because you can not guarantee that you will be able to deliver on date, people will complain as well (#366 or #369).

    If you are a developer, you will understand that dilema. Therefore he already is doing the best thing he can do: he is working on the project and is taking all time he needs.

    So just be happy that he is investing his private time to work on the migration so that we, at some point, will be able again to use this fantastic Add On. Or even better: donate some money to show that you are not taking his work for granted and see all the time and work he is putting into it.

  241. Many thanks for your hard work – NoScript is a great product and I will keep looking for it every day/

  242. @ Jarod :

    Oh I know that there’ll always be someone bitching about something and that deadlines have a weird life of their own and tend to slide further and further. :)
    I’m not complaining about the delay. I’m saying that if you make a statement like "DEFINITELY by the end of this week", rather than, say, "MAYBE by the end of this week", you’re creating undue expectations and people will hold you to them.

  243. Jarod,
    "If you make no announcement, because you can not guarantee that you will be able to deliver on date, people will complain as well (#366 or #369)."
    I am a developer as well, and I just kindly did ask for a approx. date. What part of this is a complain? Please just kill yourself :)
    And this is the only time I am complaining rn, and that just because of your shitty ass post.

  244. @AA I see your point and agree. Thanks for pointing it out and sorry for missunderstanding your post :)

    @anona I was just about to apologize for taking your post (I do agree, that it is not complaining but it still shows my point) but then I read further and sorry, you jusr disqualified yourself.
    I do not understand why you have to loose all kind of politeless and immediately start to insult a person you never met. So sorry dto disapoint you, I’ll not kill myselfbut maybe you should try ;)

  245. Been using NoScript for years, very happy with it. I’m pretty sure it has kept me out of trouble ;-)
    Looking forward to the next version. Thanks for your hard work!

  246. Definitely one of the best pieces of free software that I have been using – for FREE – so those who are moaning perhaps should look for alternatives that are costly and come with a Service Level Agereement. Hope the development is going well on the new version! Happy to beta test if required!

  247. Giorgio, thanks for NoScript, both the XUL version and the upcoming WebExtension version. Been using your NoScript add-on for over 10 years now, ever since I learned about it. It is because of both Mozilla and *you* that I can safely browse Web sites easily, on Free Software platforms. If I want to be extra-safe, then we add the Tor Browser team.

    You’re thus part of the "tri-fecta" that underpins much, much safer use of the Internet, and for this, I am grateful.

    –SYG

  248. Best of luck, always a greater challenge with a new API. There is always a question of whether the problem is in your code or the library.

  249. Ahhh! I upgraded firefox accidentally and now I have no noscript! I’ll be waiting with bated breath for the release.

  250. Just stopping by to say good luck working on the update. Major changes and the hurdles that come with them can suck sometimes. Donated, because it was long overdue and I appreciate the use I’ve gotten out of your product so far. Thank you for your hard work! :)

  251. COMMIT.

    DO IT, FÁGGÓT. WE KNOW IN ITALY YOU GOOMBAS SLEEP 20 HOURS A DAY AND SIP LATTÉS FOR 3, BUT YOU CAN’T EVEN MEET YOUR OWN DEADLINES.

    SPEND LESS TIME TUGGING YOUR PRICK WITH OLIVE OIL AND POSTING PICTURES OF YOUR SNOTNOSED PROGENY WHOM I HOPE ALL DIE OF LEUKEMIA AND A LITTLE MORE TIME AT THE GRINDSTONE.

    YOU HAD MONTHS IN THE PRE-57 HYPE TO DO THIS, BUT YOU PUT IT OFF BECAUSE YOU WERE TOO BUSY SCREWING AROUND LIKE A SILLY GOOSE. AND THESE SHILLS APOLOGIZE FOR YOUR UNPROFESSIONALISM AND ATTACK FIREFOX INSTEAD IN A DESPERATE SEARCH FOR AN OUTLET AT THEIR CORRECT FRUSTRATION WITH YOUR LAZINESS AND FALSE PROMISES.

    IS THE WEEK OVER YET, *GIORGIO*? https://youtu.be/b1HNOpzsUZc

  252. Hi Giorgio
    Just keep the good work up.
    I like NoScript and am waiting for NoScript 10.
    In the mean time, I did donate. :-)
    Regards from Switzerland,
    Rolf

  253. All these years with best firefox addon, and know the king is naked.
    Keep workong…
    Greeting from Croatia

  254. Desperate for the new version-
    Horrified on the automatic FF upgrade and noscript missing!! Keep up the good work & never mind the unjustified critics. Writing code & especially bug free/well tested code isn’t easy, so dates are always elastic. Many thanks for all the previous versions, I’ve used for years.

  255. After getting used to Firefox with No-Script, this last week has made me realize how essential No-Script to my internet experience.

    I am donating as soon as the new No-Script rolls out.

    Thank you for your hard work

  256. If you guys really need noscript asap, just use uBlock Origin medium or hard mode. Does exactly the same thing and is actually updated.

  257. Is NoScript available for any other browser besides Firefox?
    Or, is any other browser secure enough that it doesn’t need NoScript?
    I think I virussed my machine last night, surfing with NoScript SECRETLY removed by Firefux. Then finding out — the hard way — why.

  258. I’m so mad right now, a lot of my add-ons don’t work with this new FF. I must have NO Script, so I’ll be back to get it!

  259. Sir,

    Thank you so very much for the update. Browsing has been a nightmare these past few weeks with nasty things popping up all over the place. What a relief to return to safe, trouble free browsing.
    I thank you again you lovely person.

    GVM

  260. We can wait and Firefox users should be able to also install an ESR version, if necessary.

    I like people who say "I better deliver a good and stable software than to be fixed to a divine timeline".
    This shows responsibility, because Giorgio knows that there are users, who are relying on his work.

    Mozilla has made the mistake not to ask the firefox users by a dialog for their OK before that big new upodate took place or to inform them earlier to switch to the ESR line.

    So, more slowly please.

  261. Without noscript = without firefox.
    Thanks for your work, I still do not understand how is it possible to disable the scripts temporary, but I am happy you made it for quantum.
    Grazie!

  262. It’s live! Thank you, I really appreciate your work. You are great! I will surely donate soon! Keep on rockin!

  263. Firefox Quantum 57.x is so "awesome" that it won’t play the audio portion of any video that it displays. No other application running on my computer has that problem, so it probably has nothing to do with 64-bit Windows 7 Pro SP2 (fully updated) or the hardware (a do-it-yourself build).

    The Mozilla Support forum search feature is so awesome that you’d better use just one "keyword" to search for information and advice. Even then, it returns thousands of results and the likelihood that the most recent or at least one that is useful is among the first 25 is essentially zero.

    Mozilla is so awesome that after every time they release a "major" Firefox overhaul, I cannot log-in to the support forum. No, the password manager hasn’t forgotten my user name / email address / password. Mozillas hasn’t deleted them from their records, either, because I cannot create a new account with the same credentials.

    So, I’ve decided to uninstall the Quantum awesome POS with its ugly, user-hostile, and inefficient Google Chrome UI, and run Firefox 52 ESR instead. Maybe Mozilla will solve the problem eventually, but I wonder how they are going to resolve it when there is no way for someone to let them know that it exists. And how are they going to let ME know that they have solved it?

    But it doesn’t matter much to me any more. Before ESR expires, I probably will have installed Windows 10 and started running Edge instead. I am totally fed-up with Mozilla and its inablility to recognize and appreciate what works for the adults who use it in their eagerness to just make something "new" and "fresh" to impress their peers.

    Good luck with NoScript 10. I feel as though I’m saying farewell to an old, valued and trusted friend. I am sure that it will continue to be a far superior product than the web browser whose features it extends and augments will ever be. NoScript is the difference between a seasoned professional and the latest crop of sophomore software designers and programmers that evidently comprise the Firefox development "team".

  264. Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you. Cheers!

  265. Installed NoScript Quantum. The user GUI is a bit confusing so far. I like the old NoScript set up. I wish they had just stuck with the old GUI menus and not gone with this new menu.

    I miss the easier way to allow and revoke certain scripts. Sometimes I kept allowing one script at a time to see which one was needed, then revoking the ones I didn’t need. I don’t think you can do this with the Quantum version? I guess I’ll have to get used to it unless I want to see ads.

    If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!

  266. Hi,

    Why if I click on "Default" (under "No Script Settings") the line with the site address permanently disappears from the list?

  267. @Buzz:

    Seconded. I don’t seem to be able to block/allow subdomains selectively, or give temporary permissions either.

  268. Hey guys, fantastic job, well worth a couple of days wait. It took me a few mins to work out how to use it but found it fairly easy and if the new version for Tor works in the same fashion I shall have no problem.
    Thanks again and a donation will be on it’s way.

  269. Tbh the old pop-up of the add-on was way better than the new way of deactivating script files. Fix that!

  270. At least it works for now. But it would be nice to have it more like the old one was, someday in the future.

  271. Oh well… what a disappointment FF 57.0 Quantum and the new NoScript 10.1.1 turned out to be.
    I really appreciate all the hard work being done to get NoScript up and running but the GUI is a mess.
    Akward behavior indeed! Why reinvent the wheel?
    The previous version worked so well with the script popup lower right corner when action was needed.
    Please reconsider the GUI changes! Please…

  272. I agree to NoOne (#423). B4 update noscript was easy to work with, something not running, no problem.
    No, i have nearly no clue how to do the same i did b4.

    Where is, allow all, all temporarily, allow 1 for ever or just temp? Maybe i should read some documentation, maybe the gui has room to improve.

    Thx for the continuing work, despite mozilla throwing stick and stones in the communy’s ways.

  273. Thank you.

    Kinda miss being able to temporarily allow then disable scripts with a single click though the popup style window is nice to actually see the individual objects. I think playing with the new interface is in order so I can better familiarize myself with how things run.

    A side note- I was completely unaware that this is the work of a single individual and not a team. Speechless…

  274. Adding to #425: I had to deactivate noscript, due to my inability to differ between scipts i need and i don’t (for minimum site functionality). Playing around in menus, setting checkboxes doesn’t give me a clue.

    I agree to #426, the old style with its great power is somehow missing.

  275. Just to let people know that my elaborated critique was deleted from this board. So do not bother to provide serious feedback it is apparently not wanted .

  276. At #419, you say, it doesnt work with Sandboxie.

    NoScript 10 does work with Sandboxie. Works with SBIE same as before. I havent found any conflict. Can you tell what issue you are having, here or at the Sandboxie forum.

    Bo

  277. Yes, Mozilla is really, really blowing it. Ocie Hudson, post 411, said it all. Many thanks to Giorgio for years of success with the invaluable NoScript, and for the effort to make it work with this ridiculous Quantum Firefox, but this is goodbye.

  278. Temporary permissions can be given by clicking on "S", then on the clock appearing ! TO me it looks strange that so many people didn’t find how to make it.

  279. Thank you! Somehow I’d missed it entirely.

    And of course thanks to Giorgio Maone for his exceptional work and his ongoing effort.

  280. Erm, I concur with #426 and #423. Please bring back the old GUI behavior of "temporary allowing" and right click context menu pop-up

  281. Seems like enabling "script" in a Custom configuration also enables it in the "Default". Is it really meant that way?

    Now that this messed up my "Default" configuration, is there a default you can recommend?

  282. Lore writes:

    > I still do not understand how is it possible to disable the scripts temporary

    It’s rather hidden behind an additional click, which I think is very unfortunate. You firstly have to click on the "TRUSTED" icon, and *then* you need to click on the fiddly little icon of a clock *inside* that button (and which only appears at that point) to toggle from permanent to temporary trust.

    Hopefully this part of the UI will be improved. I think it’s a bad idea to require an additional click to make the permission temporary, and I don’t like the fact that the bit of the UI that you need to click on moves around whenever buttons are selected — so you don’t even know precisely *where* the second click goes until after that animation has finished! If this general approach to the buttons is kept, then the temporary trust option *really* needs its own button.

    Assigning temporary trust is the thing I *normally* want to do, so I want that to be as quick and easy to do as possible, and right now it is quite cumbersome.

  283. Thank you for the new version Giorgio but I have no idea how to ‘Temporarily Allow this Page’ or ‘Allow this Page’
    I honestly have no idea how to do this, maybe you could have an option for computer-illiterate numpties (I am one) to install the older version.
    There used to be options at the right hand bottom of my screen but it’s disappeared now.

    I am sorry to say that really does hurt my head to make sense of it

  284. A 2nd vote for SafeScript with Chrome (post #329). Echoing others here hoping the NoScript 10 interface can be simplified similar to NoScript 5.

  285. Thank you very much for your efforts to release NoScript 10.1.1.
    It seems to be working well in my environment so far. (Firefox57 x64. Win7 x64)

    There may be a drawback to the installation yet.
    However, it seems that the installation was completed by downloading the installation file "noscript-10.1.1 Xpi" locally as a file, and then dropping and dragging the files on Firefox.

    I hope to be able to add NoScript on Android FireFox as well.

  286. I have had more than a little fun fingering this out… but after crashing FF a couple times I think I got it. The full page of urls and their settings can be a real can o worms, but if one is patient it kinda works. The learning curve is decidedly steeper than the comfortable old version, but I still gots a couple brain cells left and I’ll fire them suckers up!

    btw, FF 57.0 on 16.04 Ubuntu Linux 64 bit. Nice to have NoScript back! I feel much better now. Many thanks.

  287. With noscript inavailable for a few days, I’ve found that Noscript has copied some functions from umatrix. Now I think umatrix is powerful and simple and a better choice combined with ublock origin. Bye Noscript. Too bad was great before.

  288. Looks like right now the extension disables scripting but does not process HTML noscript tags – this breaks the graceful degradation of many sites, e.g. DuckDuckGo.

    I believe this is caused by an underlying Firefox "bug" where a CSP that blocks scripts will NOT cause the noscript tags to be processed. That’s compliant to the spec but rather useless. (I can’t find the link right now.)

    So is there any update when this behavior (or the underlying firefox/spec bug) will be fixed?

  289. Many thanks for the update! :)

    What’s the difference between "Trusted" and "Custom" in the site settings? (Except that I can turn off "Scripts" when I select "Custom".)

  290. I can’t seem to set the sub-options like "Font", "Media" etc. individually per site. Whenever I turn one of them on or off, no matter if it’s a "trusted" or "custom" entry, it toggles for all sites.

  291. @penny (#437)
    ‘Temporary’ is a tiny tiny clock-icon at the end of the word ‘Trusted’.

    I have the Dutch translated version, and the text roles over for being longer translated from English, but that is a translation or space problem.
    I find the GUI confusing untill now, but I will concentrate on the options on the left only, these are more ore less the old ones. The green lock on the right for ‘Match HTPPS content only’ misleads me a lot.

  292. The UI is very confusing compared to the old one. It does not seem to be consistent either. The number of links change if you temporarily activate one? instead of displaying it now active? No Idea what the padlock means? Please go back to the old interface much preferred it. Have gone back to old Firefox with old noscript for now and appreciate how good it is and the fact it works as expected :)

  293. and I forgot to ask is it even possible to temporarily activate one script at a time in the new version/UI? For some websites I like activating just the scripts that are needed to use it (and that can be just 2-3 out of lots of mainly advertising ones) I certainly could not seem to do it using the new UI or maybe I was just confused? Thanks

  294. I also don’t like the new UI, you can’t even see the full FQDN’s. Also it is currently impossible to allow scripts when using private Mode.

    Would like to have the old style menu back with something tiny at the end to get access to the new submenu.

    Happy to see that NoScript is back. Hope the new UI becomes heavily improved or replaced over time.
    Thanks for the good and important work so far :)

  295. I too like the old UI better. Specifically, I like "temporarily allow" and "allow" having different buttons. And some better explaination of what the toggleable padlock icon does would be nice (messing with it seems to disallow whatever its next to too).

    One thing I miss is the ability to toggle global script allowing on and off from the menu.

    Another thing I really miss is the ability to disable automatic page reloads (that is, when it reloads a page after you change a permission and exit the menu). This is very important when you are in a form that you shouldn’t reload the page for, but which you have realized that you might need the scripts on for.

  296. First thank you for your work – it´s the most usefull app for firefox.

    But please bring back the OLD UI – the new one is not very good.

  297. All peоple laughed attempting too iimagine whаt kind of birthday cеlebrɑtion Mary and Joseph gave for
    Jesus when He was six. Ꮮaarry wondered, ?I bet he prefегred the same kind
    of toys we like.

  298. I deleted this new version of No Script. It is a pain to use. I like the old GUI better. PLEASE BRING BACK THE OLD NO SCRIPT without the Google Chrome GUI. It sucks.

  299. Thanks so much for the new version, browsing websites without any kind of NoScript add-on was really scary!

    I’m just a little bit confused about the new UI. In the old version you could just click on one of the domains and it would enable/disable scripts for it (and show that it’s enabled/disabled), now you have to click on it, then check the "scripts" box. Without clicking on it first, it also doesn’t tell you if scripts are enabled or disabled unless it’s set to "trusted".
    Would it be possible to get back the old UI without all the extra checkboxes (object, media, frame,…)?

  300. I just noticed something weird going on on e.g. youtube:
    If I enable scripts for googletagservices.com, it also automatically enables them for doubleclick.net, gstatic.com and all the others.
    Since it’s doing this, it also won’t load any youtube videos, it’s only showing a black screen with the grey loading circle – even after enabling all the scripts, reloading the website and restarting FF.

  301. Please rollback previuos GUI back. The new GUI is not user friendly.

    Noscript is the reason why I using FF. Thanks for developement.

  302. An addition to #458. I restarted my PC (Win 7 64bit, FF 57, no addons apart from NoScript and ABP) and it’s still doing it – not only on Youtube but also on Amazon and every other website I load. It looks like it enables every other script too if you enable a single one but it isn’t actually doing it, it’s just setting the checkmark.

  303. Today NoScript’s fonts and icons have become bigger. I don’t understand if it’s an update or a bug.

  304. @457.

    If domain is Trusted, scripts load

    If domain is Untrusted, scripts dont load

    If domain is Default or Custom, scripts run only if you check marked the box to allow scripts.

    Bo

  305. I want the old No Script back. This one makes it far too complicated to control the scripts that are allowed and disallowed. PLEASE bring back the old GUI.

  306. In the last 24 hours something seem to broken the addon, it blocks everything or nothing at all. I specify a site as trusted hit refresh and nothing happens, it also seem to be enabling everything but what I want it to. This problem only started today , last night it was functioning a 100%, now the only solution seems to be making pages temporary allow , or else it just blocks what you want to watch/read. Even had to temp allow this site to the captcha…..

  307. Rolled back to FF56 entirely because of how bad the new Noscript is.

    No right click menu? Really dawg? UI is awful, old version worked and didn’t look like shit. It’s so bad that I’m spending my own free time digging through the internet to find some dark corner just to say so in a way you might see.

  308. It looks like the new version needs some polishing.
    Still thanks a lot for this wonderful plugin guys !

  309. PLEASE bring back the old one. I spend an hour trying to figure this out and I am a software design engineer. This thing is so un-intuitive. What the hell do the buttons do, there is no help or youtube video to describe. please please pleases bring the old one back it worked so well. This sucks ass dude, like it sucks ass so bad. I am sorry I know you worked so hard on it. please forgive me for being negative.

  310. I, too, miss the old UI. It was a PITA to enable one domain at a time until a site worked, but now I can’t even do that. Still, I get it that you have been scrambling to adapt to major changes to FF, and I appreciate it. Time for me to donate! I hope you will eventually find time to provide a help function. You may think all those icons are self-explanatory, but they are not, at least not to this user.

  311. Grazie mille, Giorgio!
    NoScript is still the best extension to secure Firefox, and I encourage you to keep up your good work.
    I really hope you do not bother about some stupid complaints above.
    Freedom of speech is for everyone, even for those who don’t know what to do with it.
    Thank you very much for allowing all of us to use NoScript.

  312. After some getting used to it and researching the internet (Dr. Google & Co), Noscript works perfectly on my computer with Firefox.

  313. Vicente says: "I really hope you do not bother about some stupid complaints above.
    Freedom of speech is for everyone, even for those who don’t know what to do with it."

    You seem to know yourself quite well, now try to understand feedback.

  314. @erikdenhouter (#473)
    "You seem to know yourself quite well, now try to understand feedback".

    Your’re right, erikdenhouter. I don’t understand feedback in which people say that the software someone gives you for free "looks like shit" and stuff @(#467). I believe there are better ways to express yourself and to contribute with constructive feedback, like almost all of the responses above.

    Again, this is a great software and I use it for years. To this date, no other solution comes even closer to secure FF as this one. And since it’s offered as freeware, my greatest concern is that one day it won’t be there anymore. So I remind the developer how important it is and I thank him very much.

  315. I am missing the right click menu.

    When a page opens new window sometimes there is no "top" of the newly opened window so you cannot block script on that window.

    Also for a last week or so the noscript doesn’t work. It forces it’s own rules regardless of what I do.

    Please, put the right click menu back on.

    Thank you for your effort. I am looking forward to new releases and bug fixes.

  316. So, it appears since our boss rolled out FF Quantum that NoScript is causing issues with not being able to click Google search results, but you can right-click and open them in a new tab. Did some testing to confirm it was NoScript (disabling add-ons one at a time). Also, enabling scripts for domains seems to cause issues with some websites like Amazon (choosing jacket size in a drop down for example) where it hangs and never updates the page. Saw this on another page or two, but those didn’t have interactive content per se. Not sure if this helps, and I’ve not found any similar examples from folks, but maybe it’ll help. Love my NoScript. :)

  317. user interface is completely alien to anything i’ve used in the last 25 years.. don’t understand baby design, dumb tablet crap

  318. As a result of their hard work, Positive View’s events have received coverage from the 3 global television networks and have recently
    been streamed for online viewing. A model with 3 CCD includes a sensor that picks up each one of the
    different colors (Red, Green, and Blue) leading to superior color reproduction. Here you’ll be able to
    shop by theme or browse a whole range of themes in case you are sill unsure about what to base the
    party.

  319. The new noscript is not properly functional. When I click it my browser semi minimises and I have to maximise it again. The noscript window then detaches and comes up as a popup style window.
    I click the sites that I want to allow and categorise them as trusted but they revert back to default, no matter howmany times I click the refresh button/icon on noscript. I am still confused about the green and red locks. As to temporary allow, the less said the better. It is not user friendly, it is not intuitive and it isnot understandable.

    But I still use it because I prefer all the annoyance and frustrations of the new noscript to not having any script blocker.

    I understand it is still work in progress and I really hope it is fixed and operational like the old version that everyone was satosfied with. If it gets to be as good as the old version, I will consider a decent donation. If not I shall look at some other browser and ditch FF altogether, change to something that will provide me with inbuilt security such as Avast browser

  320. Vicente wrote (#474 ):
    "…I don’t understand feedback in which people say that the software someone gives you for free "looks like shit" and stuff @(#467). I believe there are better ways to express yourself and to contribute with constructive feedback"

    @Vicente
    "Lookes like shit…" is an expression that is not depending on paid or free software, it is an opinion, no matter how offending it may look.
    Of course, I agree, most people have their behaviour polished to get around. For this, raw and somehow unforgiving responds mostly escape my attention, but still I think they are a part of the feedback, so not to be missed by the maker as you suggested :)

    Feedback:
    tonight, when I click the NoScript icon, my Firefox exits full screen mode, and as soon as I exit the NoScript window by clicking on the page I visit, NoScript opens in another window, often behind FF. Then I have to click a window away (NoScript), and a window back to full screen (FF).

  321. Read it to late, but in #479, fred says:

    "The new noscript is not properly functional. When I click it my browser semi minimises and I have to maximise it again. The noscript window then detaches and comes up as a popup style window."

    Same here, as I explained my way in #480

  322. Give NoScript the flick and try Pi-Hole, if you have a spare VM or old PC lying about, it’s a piece of cake to setup. Thanks FF for killing the interface for our favorite add-ons. It’s just to different.

  323. Thank you Giorgio for all the hard work to get at least something to work with the new FF.

    I am staying on the ESR for now, because I can’t understand the new NS. I am afraid that I might allow something I shouldn’t have because I don’t know what I am doing. I concur with a lot of folks here and want something at least similar to the old UI.

    I was excited to update and get going again, but I just can’t. Not yet anyway. I will be reading the posts and looking for any indication that the interface gets easier to understand for "dummies" like me.

  324. New version has major issues, and a change in the last 24 hours really made things worse. As in the browser window partially minimizing every time you click on the NS icon. Having to maximize it every time after closing the NS window. Ugh!!!

    Also, changes are not being saved and there’s no longer a button to "make temporary permissions permanent". Why was that taken away? Who wants to have to re-do permissions every time you visit the same site again.

  325. Sorry old boy, have to give your new NS the boot. The thing does not even save anything except google. Nothing else. As soon as the tab is closed the settings are lost no matter how many times you refresh the NS settings. Infact on some pages (for whatever reason) the settings don’t stay even when not leaving the page. An example is XE.COM. I set the NS settings to allow xe.com then click the refresh page icon, then open NS again and it is back to Default settings that were there a few seconds ago.

    Bye for now. Once I read that the thing is working I may consider using it but at the moment it is more hassle that it is worth. Free or not, if the thing does not work it is useless. I will use Avast Browser which is much safer than FF and NS combined

  326. not sure what you did to this but it’s getting uninstalled causes more headaches then it ever did before. Thanks for your hard work in the past but I’m done trying to be nice to this addon.

  327. I’ve been using the new NS now for a bit. Getting used to it now. It does remember what you untrust. I went through and untrusted all the crap and when I go back to sites, it remembers that I don’t trust those scripts. It just takes a bit of a learning curve after using the old GUI for quite a while.

    I’ve learned that you can Default something in order to get a certain part of a website to work, then go right back and untrust it once you’re done.

    I would like the right click functions back though. That was convenient. If net neutrality is destroyed, I guess it won’t matter anymore. One more stab at what democracy we have left in America.

Comments are closed.