Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Kim Dotcom leaves court for the day after attending his extradition hearing in Auckland
Kim Dotcom leaves court for the day after attending his extradition hearing in Auckland. Photograph: Michael Bradley/AFP/Getty Images
Kim Dotcom leaves court for the day after attending his extradition hearing in Auckland. Photograph: Michael Bradley/AFP/Getty Images

Kim Dotcom case is ’simple fraud’, court told

This article is more than 8 years old

Internet mogul accused of multi-million dollar online piracy is fighting extradition to US from New Zealand

Prosecutors have outlined their extradition case against Kim Dotcom in a New Zealand court, saying the core allegation against the internet mogul accused of multimillion-dollar online piracy was fraud.

The case has already dragged on almost four years and been described by the FBI as the biggest copyright investigation in US history, involving leading-edge technology and huge sums of money.

But barrister Christine Gordon, representing US authorities who want Dotcom deported to stand trial in America, said the accusations against him were not complicated. “In the long prelude to this hearing, much has been said about the novelty and technicality of the case,” Gordon told the Auckland district court. When distractions are stripped away, the evidence boils down to a simple scheme of fraud ... the dishonesty at the core of Megaupload’s operations may be expressed in straightforward terms.”

Gordon said Dotcom had admitted his culpability in a Skype conversation that was monitored by US authorities during their lengthy investigation. “At some point, a judge will be convinced about how evil we are and then we’re in trouble,” she quoted him as saying.

The US launched its bid to extradite Dotcom shortly after New Zealand police arrested him in January 2012 during a dramatic dawn raid on his Auckland mansion.

The hearing has been delayed numerous times but judge Nevin Dawson ruled on Thursday that it would finally go ahead, rejecting applications for a stay of proceedings.

Gordon said Megaupload, the now-defunct site at the heart of Dotcom’s online empire, was part of a scheme to steal copyright-protected material. “The respondents took part in a conspiracy,” she said. “They deliberately introduced copyright-infringing material to their website, they deliberately preserved that material, they deliberately took steps to profit from that material and made vast sums of money.”

The website was an early example of cloud computing, allowing users to upload large files on to a server so others could easily download them without clogging up their email systems. At its height in 2011, Megaupload claimed to have 50 million daily users and accounted for 4% of the world’s internet traffic.

An FBI indictment alleges 90% of material on the site was copyright-protected. It claims Megaupload netted more than $175m (£115m) in criminal proceeds and cost copyright owners $500m-plus by offering pirated content.

Dotcom, a German national who moved to New Zealand in 2010, denies any wrongdoing, saying he is a legitimate internet entrepreneur. The 41-year-old and his three co-accused – ex-Megaupload executives Finn Batato, Mathias Ortmann, and Bram van der Kolk – face charges including fraud, racketeering and money laundering. They risk jail terms of up to 20 years if convicted in a US court. But first the Auckland court needs to decide if there is sufficient evidence to extradite them to the US.

The extradition hearing – expected to last at least three weeks – will resume on Friday.

Most viewed

Most viewed